<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Addictive Thoughts &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://addictivethoughts.com/topics/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://addictivethoughts.com</link>
	<description>Entertainment news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>De Niro to Star in &#8220;Another Midnight Run&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/27/de-niro-to-star-in-another-midnight-run/</link>
		<comments>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/27/de-niro-to-star-in-another-midnight-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midnight run]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert de niro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictivethoughts.com/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikki Fincke of Deadline Hollywood buried  a rather interesting nugget of information in a Jan 24th article about Robert De Niro&#8217;s transition back to Creative Artists Agency: But estimates are that the 66-year-old actor made $35M with WME&#8217;s Ari Emanuel in less than 2 years. That included the big payday for the 3rd Fockers installment which WME put [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/27/de-niro-to-star-in-another-midnight-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Fan</title>
		<link>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/05/big-fan/</link>
		<comments>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/05/big-fan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patton oswalt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictivethoughts.com/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul is in his mid-thirties, single, and still living at home with his mother. He works as a parking lot attendant in New York, and is content to sit in his booth at night writing down passionate, articulate rants, so that when he goes home he can call a local radio sports show and prove [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/05/big-fan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lovely Bones</title>
		<link>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/03/the-lovely-bones/</link>
		<comments>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/03/the-lovely-bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lovely bones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark wahlberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictivethoughts.com/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson&#8217;s The Lovely Bones is a colossally misguided failure. Based on the well-received 2002 novel by Alice Sebold, Jackson &#8212; along with his Lord of the Rings cohorts, Philippa Boyens and Fran Walsh &#8212; has penned a meandering screenplay, made merely all the worse by uniformly awful performances, poor editing, and generally bad filmmaking. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/03/the-lovely-bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 of the Best Movies from 2009</title>
		<link>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/01/15-of-the-best-movies-from-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/01/15-of-the-best-movies-from-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictivethoughts.com/?p=1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2009 was actually a rather solid year for film. It was harder to pick favourites than last year. I have to admit, though, that I haven&#8217;t been keeping up with some of the Oscar contenders &#8212; I&#8217;ve yet to watch Up in the Air, A Single Man, etc., so this list is kind of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://addictivethoughts.com/2010/01/01/15-of-the-best-movies-from-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherlock Holmes</title>
		<link>http://addictivethoughts.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes/</link>
		<comments>http://addictivethoughts.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert downey jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherlock holmes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictivethoughts.com/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes is positing itself as a new beginning for the iconic Baker Street detective, even going so far as to set itself up for a sequel with its series&#8217; most recognizable villain much in the same way that Batman Begins did with the Joker. Only problem is, it&#8217;s not an entirely effective reboot. For [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://addictivethoughts.com/2009/12/30/sherlock-holmes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

